![]() | ![]() |
Yeah - me too.
Voltaire's Panty Line is thick, vain, lacks any subtlety of interpretation, has had a personality bypass and is a cunt. The rest of them twats have the same stupid, dozy equivalent of HP's metrosexual commentators self obsession and self-satisfaction. Filth!
They also have the same kind of political complacency (happy to wallow in the shit filled swamp they have created). Enjoy your death (political and otherwise -- oh hang on -- they already have died politically) idiots and fools!
Spit. Spit again for good measure.
Posted by: Will at January 24, 2008 01:57 AMDon't be silly Jim - I would never (need to) say anything like that about you.
Posted by: hakmao at January 24, 2008 06:19 AMWhen I occasionally wade through the on-line swamp to which you refer I sometimes have an urge to comment. At this point, and for the reasons you (and Mr Rubbish) articulate, I do something useful instead.
Posted by: SP at January 24, 2008 09:25 AMP.S. my one exception to this has been to challenge the twats who have tried to tag Jim as a racist.
Posted by: SP at January 24, 2008 09:35 AMThere are many online swamps. I didn't have a specific site in mind, although will admit I was peeved by some card-carrying morons the other day.
Posted by: hakmao at January 24, 2008 03:31 PM... such as cognitively defective individuals who interpreted the posting of the Norman Podhoretz video here, not as the invitation to point and laugh it was, but as a ringing endorsement of the twat.
My tolerance and good humour declines in inverse--and logarithmic--proportion to the number of times I am forced to restate first principles for the hard-of-attention, and the frequency with which I am told that I really meant 'pig' when there, in little ones and zeroes on the screen, I have written 'duck'.
Posted by: hakmao at January 24, 2008 05:54 PM